Mississippi Valley
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
587  Joyce Chumo SR 21:05
3,338  Savannah Gillard SO 24:42
3,376  Tamara Gillard SO 24:49
3,482  Keimara Davis FR 25:15
3,648  Jovanna Peterson SR 26:10
3,859  Aliah Benson FR 30:25
3,882  Kellie Rolle FR 32:10
3,891  Mercy Lagat FR 34:14
National Rank #314 of 340
South Region Rank #40 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 39th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Joyce Chumo Savannah Gillard Tamara Gillard Keimara Davis Jovanna Peterson Aliah Benson Kellie Rolle Mercy Lagat
Rhodes Invitational 09/28 1972 24:42 24:31 34:37 26:31 29:38 32:09 34:52
Watson Ford Invitational 10/04 1534 21:01 24:08 24:40 24:51 26:36 34:41 32:28
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/18 1548 21:02 24:45 25:34 24:41 25:41 30:28 34:04
SWAC Championships 10/28 1556 21:19 24:55 24:42 24:38 26:11 30:17 34:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 38.9 1169



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Joyce Chumo 55.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3
Savannah Gillard 266.5
Tamara Gillard 269.7
Keimara Davis 280.4
Jovanna Peterson 294.5
Aliah Benson 316.7
Kellie Rolle 319.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 0.0% 0.0 35
36 0.1% 0.1 36
37 2.8% 2.8 37
38 24.2% 24.2 38
39 50.3% 50.3 39
40 22.3% 22.3 40
41 0.2% 0.2 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0